Compare AI models: Ling 3.1 Flash vs GLM-5.2
- Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GLM-5.2Zhipu
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 64/100 | 63/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| GLM-5.2 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 31/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 88/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$1.40/ 1M
Output
$0.90/ 1M
$4.40/ 1M
Cached input
$0.06/ 1M
$0.26/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
41K
228K
Completed sessions
825,434
651,336
Token share
0.02%
0.1%
Tokens
252B+100%
1T-87%
AUG 23OCT 17
AUG 23OCT 17
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
58.7%21K user-weeks