Compare AI models: Aion-3.0 vs Ling 3.1 Flash
- Aion-3.0Aion LabsHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aion-3.0 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 25/100 | 35/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 64/100 | 63/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
131K
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$3.00/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$0.90/ 1M
Cached input
$0.75/ 1M
$0.06/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
41K
Completed sessions
No usage
825,434
Token share
No usage
0.02%
Tokens
No usage
252B+100%
No trend data
AUG 23OCT 17
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending